About Revnets

by Jango – originally shared on revnet.eth.limo

Revnets are revenue-backed networks of friends, investors, builders, donors, fee-paying consumers, and anons around the world without need for governance, management, permission, or any coordination.

Revnets are great for managing revenues and funding for open source projects and internet networks by:

Read the pitch to open source

Thesis

Networks should own their own growth

Investors, builders, artists, storytellers, fans, donors, and fee-paying retail consumers are all participants who help sustain a network and should all benefit from revenue growth.

Incentives should be clear to everyone, from startup to scale

Financially empowering both elders and newcomers within a framework of open, voluntary participation supports a network’s evolution by transparently reflecting everyone’s risks and contributions over time.

Rent seeking should be inefficient

Given our world of uncertainty and opportunism, networks best sustain fruitful participation when equipped with a reliable immunity instinct that efficiently protects and rewards productivity.

How it works

In practice, revnets implement Retailism:

(The following is adapted from original Retailism post)

What is Retailism

A business framework where wealth is exchanged programmatically over time from newer participants to elder ones, and where investors and customers are treated as alike participants. The “bag”, or the debt, is passed incrementally, predictably, and ceremonially from one generation of voluntary participants to the next, without need to orient towards retail extraction. Nothing is free, but things reliably tend to become more and more free as a network grows over time.

Why do we want it

Retailism is neither corporate capitalism, which defines generations through the passing of a bag along Series A, B, and C investors, eventually selling to retail who continues this cycle of amplifying narratives that pump and dump bags. Nor is it corporate non-profitism or donationism, which obfuscate risks and incentives altogether.

These are both increasingly fragile forms of production within internet-native markets since their requisite delineation between capital and labor becomes fuzzy – does an AI assist you or do you assist it? Does your crypto currency work for you or do you work for it? Do your social networks serve you or do you serve them? Hard to say, on the internet the act of investing and consuming are often intertwined, and tail-risks of a network’s failure are spread throughout it.

Retailism hints at a progression of the status quo that can outcompete within a broader capitalist marketplace of -isms by empowering the producer-consumer.

Who is it for

Devs and communities will choose a Retailist business structure when they prefer their outcome to be oriented towards maximizing the network’s self-propagation while minimizing the growth potential of any party with privileged access and exploitable liabilites. They’ll understand their work to have value while also understanding a network’s preference to work for itself once instigated.

Why now

The Retailism framework is too fragile to exist if a rent-seeking fiduciary facilitating the handling of money and the generational handoffs is required. It can only outcompete as an encoded contract between network participants enforced by a blockchain, a recent breakthrough.

It is now possible to encode this without any new code at all through onchain protocols like Juicebox.

How exactly does it work

For each network, the framework depends on only three variables:

1. Ceiling increase rate

2. Floor tax intensity

3. Boost

Once in motion, a network’s revenue and investments should all be routed to its revnet, the only way to access its $TOKENs.

If a liquidity pool with a better price than the current issuance rate exists, inbound payments are routed to it instead. The issuance rate dampens upward hyperbolic price manipulation of this pool by setting a price ceiling, and the redemption rate dampens downward manipulation by setting a price floor that increases with each subsequent redemption. These ensure participants a window of opportunity for each generation, with a frame that can only progress upward over time.

More

A Retailistic View on CAC and LTV

Modeling Retailism

Retailism for Devs, Investors, and Customers

Observations: Network dynamics similar between atoms, cells, organisms, groups, dance parties

Implementation

Revnets and $REV are expressed using the $NANA fork of the Juicebox V3 Protocol and Uniswap Protocol, on Mainnet, Optimism, and any number of other L2s.

$REV Specifications

The Revnet Research Network (RRN) will develop tools for people to grow revnets across the internet, including at revnet.app where new revnets can be deployed and accessed. It will work with the JuiceboxDAO community to deploy a forked Juicebox Protocol that runs as a $JBX-operated revnet ($NANA), and will itself fund the development of tools it builds through a revnet that issues $REV.

The $REV revnet will have the following specification:

Property Value
Initial price ceiling 1,000 $REV / ETH
Price ceiling’s increase rate 2.5% every 28 days
Boost 30,000 $REV upfront and 20% new $REV for 3 years to RRN multisig
Price floor’s tax intensity 10%

Once deployed, revnets cannot change their specification.

Revnets - Season 1

See https://hackmd.io/@jango/revnets-1

>> Home